Macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet age related macular degeneration: consultation document

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Interventional procedure consultation document

Macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet age related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an eye disorder affecting the macula, which is the area at the centre of the retina (the back of the eye) responsible for central vision (seeing things straight in front of you). Wet AMD happens because fluid leaks out of abnormally formed arteries and veins into the area under the macula (the choroid layer), causing scarring.

Macular translocation with 360° retinotomy aims to improve vision. It involves cutting the macula and moving it to a nearby healthier area of the choroid layer. The macula is moved from its normal position by making a cut around the edge of the retina. This is called macular translocation with 360° retinotomy.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is examining macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet age related macular degeneration and will publish guidance on its safety and efficacy to the NHS in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. NICE’s Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee has considered the available evidence and the views of Specialist Advisers, who are consultants with knowledge of the procedure. The Advisory Committee has made provisional recommendations about macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet age related macular degeneration.

This document summarises the procedure and sets out the provisional recommendations made by the Advisory Committee. It has been prepared for public consultation. The Advisory Committee particularly welcomes:

  • comments on the provisional recommendations
  • the identification of factual inaccuracies
  • additional relevant evidence, with bibliographic references where possible.

Note that this document is not NICE’s formal guidance on this procedure. The recommendations are provisional and may change after consultation.

The process that NICE will follow after the consultation period ends is as follows.

  • The Advisory Committee will meet again to consider the original evidence and its provisional recommendations in the light of the comments received during consultation.
  • The Advisory Committee will then prepare draft guidance which will be the basis for NICE’s guidance on the use of the procedure in the NHS in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

For further details, see the Interventional Procedures Programme manual, which is available from the NICE website (www.nice.org.uk/ipprogrammemanual).

NICE is committed to promoting through its guidance race and disability equality and equality between men and women, and to eliminating all forms of discrimination. One of the ways we do this is by trying to involve as wide a range of people and interest groups as possible in the development of our guidance on interventional procedures. In particular, we aim to encourage people and organisations from groups in the population who might not normally comment on our guidance to do so. We also ask consultees to highlight any ways in which draft guidance fails to promote equality or tackle discrimination and give suggestions for how it might be improved. NICE reserves the right to summarise and edit comments received during consultations, or not to publish them at all, where in the reasonable opinion of NICE, the comments are voluminous, publication would be unlawful or publication would otherwise be inappropriate.

Closing date for comments: 27 January 2010

Target date for publication of guidance: April 2010

 

1       Provisional recommendations

1.1  Current evidence on macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) shows that this procedure is efficacious only in a proportion of patients and that there is a potential for serious adverse events. Therefore the procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit or research.

1.2  Clinicians wishing to undertake macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet AMD should take the following actions.

·     Inform the clinical governance leads in their Trusts.

·     Ensure that patients and their carers understand the uncertainty about the procedure’s safety and efficacy and provide them with clear information about both this procedure and alternative treatments. In addition, the use of NICE’s information for patients (‘Understanding NICE guidance’) is recommended (available from www.nice.org.uk/IPG790publicinfo). [[details to be completed at publication]]

·     Audit and review clinical outcomes of all patients having macular translocation with 360°retinotomy for wet AMD (see section 3.1).

2       The procedure

2.1    Indications and current treatments

2.1.1  Age-related macular degeneration is the most common cause of blindness in developed countries. A small proportion of patients with AMD have wet AMD (also known as neovascular or exudative AMD). Wet AMD is characterised by the abnormal growth of blood vessels in the choroid layer underneath the macular part of the retina. These vessels can threaten vision if they leak and cause scarring.

2.1.2  Depending on disease stage, current treatments for wet AMD may include laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and implantation of miniature lens systems. Patients with advanced disease may benefit from optical aids such as magnifying glasses.

2.2    Outline of the procedure

2.2.1  The aim of macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet AMD is to move the macula so that it lies over a healthier part of the choroid layer that is unaffected by neovascularisation.

2.2.2  In macular translocation with 360° retinotomy for wet AMD a vitrectomy is done and the retina is then detached from the back of the eye using an injection of saline solution. An incision is made around the entire perimeter of the retina so that it is freely mobile, and attached only at the optic disc. The abnormal choroidal vessels are removed and the retina is reattached with the macula rotated away from the original disease site. Once the retina is reattached the vitreous cavity is injected with silicone oil for tamponade. In a second operation approximately 1–2 months later, the whole globe is rotated in the opposite direction by dividing and reattaching the external ocular muscles in order to remove the resulting visual disturbance caused by the torsion and the silicone oil is drained from the vitreous cavity.

Sections 2.3 and 2.4 describe efficacy and safety outcomes from the published literature that the Committee considered as part of the evidence about this procedure. For more detailed information on the evidence, see the overview, available at .www.nice.org.uk/IP790overview.

 

2.3    Efficacy

2.3.1  A randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 50 patients treated by macular translocation with 360° retinotomy or PDT reported an increase of 3 lines or more of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 40% (10/25) and 0% (0/25) of patients respectively at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.0006). A case series of 50 patients reported 2-line or greater BCVA improvement in 66% (33/50), no improvement in 28% (14/50) and a loss of more than 2 lines in 6% (3/50) of patients at 21-month follow-up. A case series of 64 patients reported BCVA improvement of 1 line or more in 52% (32/61) and a loss of more than 3 lines in 11% (7/61) of patients at 12-month follow-up.

2.3.2  A non-randomised controlled study of 24 patients reported that mean BCVA improved from 0.90 to 0.69 logMAR in 12 patients treated by macular translocation with 360° retinotomy and worsened from 0.87 to 1.38 logMAR in 12 patients treated by choroidal patch graft at 3-year follow-up (significance not stated).   

2.3.3  The case series of 64 patients reported that median reading speed improved among 55 patients from 71 words per minute at baseline to 105 words per minute at 12‑month follow-up (p < 0.001).

2.3.4  The RCT of 50 patients reported that quality-of-life scores for general vision improved more after macular translocation with 360° retinotomy (+13.6 points) than after PDT (+3.7 points) at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.03).

2.3.5  The Specialist Advisers listed key efficacy outcomes as attached retina following surgery, functional outcomes of BCVA, and reading speed.

2.4    Safety

2.4.1  Retinal detachment (requiring vitrectomy and endotamponade for reattachment) was reported in 24% (6/25) of patients treated by the procedure in the RCT of 50 patients (timing of events not stated). In the non-randomised controlled study of 24 patients retinal detachment (requiring repair) was reported in 25% (3/12) of patients treated by the procedure and 33% (4/12) of patients treated by a choroid patch graft (follow-up more than 12 months). In case series of 90 and 64 patients, retinal detachment was reported in 19% (absolute figures not stated) and 8% (5/61) of patients respectively (12-month follow-up for both studies).

2.4.2  In the non-randomised controlled study of 24 patients, residual torsion requiring a third procedure was reported in 17% (2/12) of patients treated by the procedure (timing of events not stated).

2.4.3  Retinal slippage from the desired final location after translocation was reported in 3% (2/75) of eyes in the case series of 75 eyes (number of patients not stated).

2.4.4  The Specialist Advisers stated that adverse events reported in the literature include proliferative vitreoretinopathy, macular oedema, diplopia, and phthisis. They listed theoretical adverse events as recurrence of neovascularisation. 

2.5.1  Other comments

2.5.2  The Committee noted that intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents are more commonly used for the treatment of AMD than surgical techniques. For more information see ‘Ranibizumab and pegaptanib for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration’ (NICE technology appraisal guidance 155), available from www.nice.org.uk/TA155

3     Further information

3.1  This guidance requires that clinicians undertaking the procedure make special arrangements for audit. NICE has identified relevant audit criteria and is developing an audit tool (which is for use at local discretion), which will be available when the guidance is published.

3.2  For related NICE guidance see www.nice.org.uk.

Bruce Campbell
Chairman, Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee
December 2009

Personal data will not be posted on the NICE website. In accordance with the Data Protection Act names will be anonymised, other than in circumstances where explicit permission has been given.

 It is the responsibility of consultees to accurately cite academic work in order that they can be validated.

This page was last updated: 19 August 2015