1 Recommendations

1 Recommendations

1.1 Evidence on the safety of leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmias shows that there are serious but well-recognised complications. The evidence on efficacy is inadequate in quantity and quality:

1.2 Clinicians wishing to do leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmias in people who cannot have conventional cardiac pacemaker implantation should:

1.3 Further research in people who could have conventional cardiac pacemaker implantation should report the patient selection criteria and compare leadless pacemakers with conventional pacemakers. Follow‑up should be for at least 5 years and outcomes should include adverse events, symptom relief, quality of life and device durability in the long‑term.

1.4 Clinicians should enter details about all patients having leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmias onto the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research database and review local clinical outcomes.

1.5 The procedure should only be done in specialist centres by clinicians with specific training on, and supervised experience in, inserting the device. Centres where this procedure is done should have both cardiac and vascular surgical support for emergency treatment of complications.

1.7 NICE may review this procedure on publication of further evidence.

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)