1 Recommendations

1 Recommendations

People with acute hypoxic respiratory failure

People with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

1.3

Patient selection should be done by a multidisciplinary team including healthcare professionals with specialist expertise in managing acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

1.4

The procedure should only be done by healthcare professionals with specialist expertise in the procedure in specialist intensive care centres with appropriate levels of support.

1.5

Research should report:

  • short‑term and long‑term:

    • patient‑reported outcomes

    • improvements in respiratory function

  • adverse events including:

    • bleeding

    • symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial bleeding

    • infection

    • cannulation complications

    • pain.

Why the committee made these recommendations

Some people with acute respiratory failure have low levels of oxygen in their blood (acute hypoxic respiratory failure). When compared with standard care, available evidence shows that ECCO2R has no effect on how long these people live, how long they spend in hospital, or how long they spend in intensive care. There is also evidence of an increased risk of bleeding in the brain when this procedure is used. So, this procedure should not be done for acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Some people with acute respiratory failure have increased levels of carbon dioxide in their blood (acute hypercapnic respiratory failure). There is limited evidence for the efficacy of ECCO2R in this group, and there are safety concerns around its use. When compared with standard care, the evidence suggests that people who have this procedure spend less time on ventilation, and there is no change in the number of serious adverse events. But it is uncertain if this procedure leads to improved long‑term benefits. So, this procedure should only be used in research for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)