Quality standard
Quality statement 5: Access to endometrial ablation
- Quality statement
- Rationale
- Quality measures
- What the quality statement means for service providers, healthcare professionals and commissioners
- What the quality statement means for patients and carers
- Source guidance
- Definitions of terms used in this quality statement
- Equality and diversity considerations
Quality statement 5: Access to endometrial ablation
Quality statement
Women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Rationale
Some women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids may choose surgery if they do not wish to have drug treatment or if drug treatment is contraindicated or fails to adequately control their symptoms. Endometrial ablation is a less invasive surgical procedure than hysterectomy, is associated with fewer complications and can be performed as day surgery. It is important that all women have the opportunity to discuss the risks and benefits of both endometrial ablation and hysterectomy to enable them to make an informed decision about which intervention is most appropriate for them. Evidence suggests that women who live in poorer areas are more likely to undergo hysterectomy rather than endometrial ablation compared with women who live in more affluent areas[2].
Quality measures
Structure
a) Evidence of local arrangements that women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Data source: Local data collection.
b) Evidence that service providers have networks in place to refer women for endometrial ablation if this intervention is not provided locally.
Data source: Local data collection. The National heavy menstrual bleeding audit includes an organisational audit to establish provision of treatment options (see section 4 in the first annual report of the National heavy menstrual bleeding audit). These data may inform a baseline assessment.
Process
The proportion of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Numerator – the number of women in the denominator who have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Denominator – the number of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention.
Data source: Local data collection. The National heavy menstrual bleeding audit includes an analysis of patterns of surgical treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (see section 3 and appendix 3 in the first annual report of the National heavy menstrual bleeding audit). These data may inform a baseline assessment.
Outcome
a) Women's satisfaction with the decision‑making process when choosing surgical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Data source: Local data collection. The National heavy menstrual bleeding audit includes an analysis of women's self-reported experiences of the secondary care they received. The analysis includes the elements 'information received and satisfaction with information received', 'communication with doctors in secondary care' and 'overall rating of care received' (see section 7 in the third annual report of the National heavy menstrual bleeding audit). These data may inform a baseline assessment.
b) Rates of endometrial ablation and hysterectomy.
Data source: Local data collection. The National heavy menstrual bleeding audit includes an analysis of patterns of surgical treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (see section 3 and appendix 3 in the first annual report of the National heavy menstrual bleeding audit). These data may inform a baseline assessment.
What the quality statement means for service providers, healthcare professionals and commissioners
Service providers ensure that systems are in place for women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention to have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Healthcare professionals ensure that women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
Commissioners ensure that they commission services with local agreements for women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids who choose surgical intervention to have a documented discussion about endometrial ablation as a preferred treatment to hysterectomy.
What the quality statement means for patients and carers
Women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids (non-cancerous growths in the womb) who choose surgery have a recorded discussion about endometrial ablation (removal of the lining of the womb) as an alternative to hysterectomy (removal of the womb).
Definitions of terms used in this quality statement
Documented discussion
The discussion should be between the woman and the relevant clinician. It should reflect the guidance in sections 1.6 and 1.8 of NICE clinical guideline 44 and include the different types of interventions and the potential short-, medium- and long-term effects these can have. This discussion should be documented in the woman's notes. Written information about the different treatment options should be given to the woman.
Uterine fibroids
The full clinical guideline on heavy menstrual bleeding defines uterine fibroids as smooth-muscle tumours of the uterus, generally benign although occasionally (less than 1%) malignant. They vary greatly in size from millimetres to tens of centimetres, and are associated with heavy periods, pressure symptoms and occasionally pain. Small uterine fibroids are 3 cm or less in diameter and large uterine fibroids are more than 3 cm in diameter.
Endometrial ablation
NICE clinical guideline 44 recommends that all women considering endometrial ablation should have access to a second-generation ablation technique (see recommendations 1.6.6 and 1.6.7).
Women who choose surgery
In women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterus or small uterine fibroids, drug treatment should be considered before surgical intervention (see quality statement 3). For some women drug treatment may be unsuitable because it is declined, contraindicated or fails to adequately control their symptoms.
Equality and diversity considerations
Women from all socioeconomic backgrounds should have equal access to information about their treatment options. Evidence suggests that women who live in poorer areas are more likely to undergo hysterectomy rather than endometrial ablation compared with women who live in more affluent areas[2].
[2] Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2011) National heavy menstrual bleeding audit. First annual report.