Recommendation ID
IPG722/01
Question

Evidence on the safety and efficacy of intramedullary distraction for upper limb lengthening is inadequate in quantity and quality. But because this is a rare condition with limited alternative treatments, the procedure can be considered as long as special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research are in place. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

Further research, which could be registry data, should report details of patient selection, device selection, technique used, procedural outcomes, long-term outcomes including quality of life, the need for repeat interventions or surgery and complication rates.

Any explanatory notes
(if applicable)

Source guidance details

Comes from guidance
Intramedullary distraction for upper limb lengthening
Number
IPG722
Date issued
April 2022

Other details

Is this a recommendation for the use of a technology only in the context of research? No  
Is it a recommendation that suggests collection of data or the establishment of a register?   No  
Last Reviewed 30/04/2022