Shared learning database

 
Organisation:
Musgrove Park Hospital
Published date:
November 2012

We targeted two major priorities in our care for children and young people with epilepsy.
(i) Referral time by primary care to a specialist in Paediatric Epilepsy.
(ii) Information shared and, in particular the very difficult subject of SUDEP.

Guidance the shared learning relates to:
Does the example relate to a general implementation of all NICE guidance?
No
Does the example relate to a specific implementation of a specific piece of NICE guidance?
Yes

Example

Aims and objectives

Having audited our quality of care for children with epilepsy in 2011, we were aware of deficiencies in our service. The publication of NICE CG137 in January 2012 confirmed what we needed to change to comply with:
(i) Helping primary care refer to a specialist with 2 weeks of a first suspected non-febrile seizure.
(ii) Providing more information to parents and families particularly information about SUDEP.

Reasons for implementing your project

Prior to 2012:
(i) Most referrals from primary care were seen thorough Choose & Book appointments which often involved an excessive delay in a child being seen for a suspected first non-febrile seizure.
(ii) Although information was given about epilepsy, this was in a somewhat ah hoc way with incomplete coverage and we had no suitable information to give as a Patient information Leaflet (PiL) about SUDEP in children and young people.

How did you implement the project

(i) An electronic alert (please refer to the supporting material) was sent to all Somerset GPs to ensure that all children, young people and adults with a recent onset suspected seizure should be seen within 2 weeks by a specialist. To facillitate this, GPs were requested to refer all children and young people via our paediatric "Advice and Guidance" service where the referral would be prioritised to one of our newly created "First fit" clinics run by paediatric specialists.
(ii) A SUPED PiL has now ben produced (refer to supporting material) which is specific to the needs of young people and the parents of children with epilepsy. This forms part of our newly created comprehensive list of information filed in the notes to ensure all information specified by NICE CG137 is shared with such families (see Paediatric Epilepsy Checkist in supporting material).

Key findings

(i) Now, no new referral for childhood epilepsy should wait more than 2 weeks to be seen.
(ii) We now have an Epilepsy Check List in the notes of all children and young people with epilepsy to comply with the information sharing specified by NICE CG137. In addition when families are ready we have a suitable SUDEP PiL for them to read and promote safety and help in future discussions. We intend to audit this in 2013.

Key learning points

(i) Must inform Primary Care of their responsibilities to comply with the NICE referral time-line. We found that few GPs were aware of the "within 2 weeks" target.
(ii) However good one feels information sharing is, it is rarely comprenhensive. An Epilepsy Check List provides exactly that: a way of ensuring that all relevant information is eventually shared through the disclosure of on-going care. To our knowledge, our SUDEP PiL provides the first patient information leaflet aimed specifically at the difficult subject of SUDEP in children.

Contact details

Name:
Dr Andrew Tandy
Job:
Consultant Paediatrician
Organisation:
Musgrove Park Hospital
Email:
andy.tandy@tst.nhs.uk

Sector:
Secondary care
Is the example industry-sponsored in any way?
No