How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Consultation

    Has all of the relevant evidence been taken into account?
  • Question on Consultation

    Are the summaries of clinical and cost effectiveness reasonable interpretations of the evidence?
  • Question on Consultation

    Are the recommendations sound and a suitable basis for guidance to the NHS?
  • Question on Consultation

    Are there any aspects of the recommendations that need particular consideration to ensure we avoid unlawful discrimination against any group of people on the grounds of race, gender, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation, age, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity?
The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

1 Recommendations

1.1 Rucaparib is not recommended, within its marketing authorisation, for maintenance treatment of relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer that has responded to platinum-based chemotherapy in adults.

1.2 This recommendation is not intended to affect treatment with rucaparib that was started in the NHS before this guidance was published. People having treatment outside this recommendation may continue without change to the funding arrangements in place for them before this guidance was published, until they and their NHS clinician consider it appropriate to stop.

Why the committee made these recommendations

The clinical evidence shows that rucaparib extends the time until cancer progresses compared with routine care. How much longer people live after taking rucaparib is uncertain because the data from the trial are not available yet. However, the cost-effectiveness estimates are higher than what NICE normally considers acceptable, so it is not recommended for routine use in the NHS.

Rucaparib does not have the plausible potential to be cost effective so it does not meet NICE's Cancer Drugs Fund criteria. Therefore, it is not recommended.