Corporate document

Appendix 2 - References

Appendix 2 - References

Summary of topics of included and excluded references

Attribute Name

Count

Include - Standards for PDAs

27

Include - Models for testing PDAs

1

Include - Quality of reporting of PDAs

6

Include - Measures of PDA effectiveness

4

Exclude - Theory about PDAs

4

Exclude - Content of PDAs

6

Exclude - Development/appraisal/validation of PDA

155

Exclude - Identification of PDAs

32

Exclude - Not about patient decision aids

210

Exclude - Implementing PDAs

11

Exclude - Effectiveness of PDAs

29

Exclude - Discussion/opinion

8

Exclude - No abstract

1

None of the above

0

Included studies – decision aid standards

  1. Abhyankar, Purva, Volk, Robert J, Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer et al. (2013) Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 (Suppl.2): 6

  2. Bekker, Hilary L (2010) The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions? Patient education and counseling 78(3): 357-64

  3. Charvet-Berard AI; Chopard P; Perneger TV (2008) Measuring quality of patient information documents with an expanded EQIP scale. Patient education and counseling 70(3): 407-411

  4. Coulter, Angela, Stilwell, Diana, Kryworuchko, Jennifer et al. (2013) A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 (Suppl.2): 2

  5. Dowie, Jack; Kaltoft, Mette Kjer; Rajput, Vije Kumar (2020) Measures of Decision Aid Quality Are Preference-Sensitive and Interest-Conflicted - 1: Normative Measures. Studies in health technology and informatics 275: 47-51

  6. Dowie, Jack; Kaltoft, Mette Kjer; Rajput, Vije Kumar (2020) Measures of Decision Aid Quality Are Preference-Sensitive and Interest-Conflicted - 2: Empirical Measures. Studies in health technology and informatics 275: 52-56

  7. Durand, Marie-Anne, Dannenberg, Michelle D, Saunders, Catherine H et al. (2019) Modified Delphi survey for the evidence summarisation of patient decision aids: Study protocol. BMJ open 9(3): e026701

  8. Durand, Marie-Anne, Witt, Jana, Joseph-Williams, Natalie et al. (2015) Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient education and counseling 98(4): 462-8

  9. Elwyn, Glyn, Burstin, Helen, Barry, Michael J et al. (2018) A proposal for the development of national certification standards for patient decision aids in the US. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 122(7): 703-706

  10. Elwyn, Glyn, O'Connor, Annette M, Bennett, Carol et al. (2009) Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PloS one 4(3): e4705

  11. Elwyn, Glyn, O'Connor, Annette, Stacey, Dawn et al. (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 333(7565): 417

  12. Fagerlin, Angela, Pignone, Michael, Abhyankar, Purva et al. (2013) Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 (Suppl.2): 8

  13. Hoefel L, Lewis KB, O'Connor A et al. (2020) 20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 2 Subanalysis of a Systematic Review of Patient Decision Aids. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 40(4): 522-539

  14. Hoefel L, O'Connor AM, Lewis KB et al. (2020) 20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 40(5): 555-581

  15. Joseph-Williams, Natalie, Newcombe, Robert, Politi, Mary et al. (2014) Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 34(6): 699-710

  16. Koon, Sean (2020) Important Considerations for Design and Implementation of Decision Aids for Shared Medical Decision Making. The Permanente journal 24

  17. Lenz M and Kasper J (2007) MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids. Psycho-social medicine 4: Doc09

  18. McDonald, Heather; Charles, Cathy; Gafni, Amiram (2014) Assessing the conceptual clarity and evidence base of quality criteria/standards developed for evaluating decision aids. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 17(2): 232-43

  19. Montori, Victor M, LeBlanc, Annie, Buchholz, Angela et al. (2013) Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 (Suppl.2): 5

  20. Poddar, Urbashi, Brownlee, Shannon, Stacey, Dawn et al. (2015) Patient Decision Aids: A Case for Certification at the National Level in the United States. The Journal of clinical ethics 26(4): 306-11

  21. Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L et al. (2020) 20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 40(3): 379-398

  22. Stevens, G., Theiler, R., Washburn, H. et al. (2018) Is honesty the best policy? The adequacy of disclosure as a strategy for addressing competing interests in patient decision aid development. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 23 (Suppl.1): a19

  23. Thompson, R., Stevens, G., Washburn, H. et al. (2019) Is disclosure of financial conflicts of interest in patient decision aids effective? insights from a simulated pilot. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 24 (Suppl.1): a30

  24. van der Weijden, Trudy, Dreesens, Dunja, Faber, Marjan J et al. (2019) Developing quality criteria for patient-directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 22(2): 201-208

  25. Volk, Robert J, Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary, Stacey, Dawn et al. (2013) Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 (Suppl.2): 1

  26. Vromans, Ruben D, van Eenbergen, Mies C, Pauws, Steffen C et al. (2019) Communicative aspects of decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment - A systematic review. Urologic oncology 37(7): 409-429

  27. Wieringa, Thomas H, Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene, Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela et al. (2019) Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Systematic reviews 8(1): 121

Included studies – model for field testing

  1. Evans, Rhodri, Elwyn, Glyn, Edwards, Adrian et al. (2007) Toward a model for field-testing patient decision-support technologies: a qualitative field-testing study. Journal of medical Internet research 9(3): e21

Included studies – quality of reporting

  1. Bonner, Carissa, Patel, Pinika, Fajardo, Michael Anthony et al. (2019) Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients. BMJ open 9(3): e025173

  2. Hoffman, Aubri S, Sepucha, Karen R, Abhyankar, Purva et al. (2018) Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature. BMJ quality & safety 27(5): 389-412

  3. Lewis, Krystina B, Wood, Brianne, Sepucha, Karen R et al. (2017) Quality of reporting of patient decision aids in recent randomized controlled trials: A descriptive synthesis and comparative analysis. Patient education and counseling 100(7): 1387-1393

  4. O'Connor, Annette M, Bennett, Carol, Stacey, Dawn et al. (2007) Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 27(5): 554 74

  5. Sepucha, Karen R, Abhyankar, Purva, Hoffman, Aubri S et al. (2018) Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist. BMJ quality & safety 27(5): 380-388

  6. Sepucha, Karen R, Matlock, Daniel D, Wills, Celia E et al. (2014) "It's Valid and Reliable" Is Not Enough: Critical Appraisal of Reporting of Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 34(5): 560-6

Included studies – measures of PDA effectiveness

  1. Bekker, Hilary L, Legare, France, Stacey, Dawn et al. (2003) Is anxiety a suitable measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review?. Patient education and counseling 50(3): 255-62

  2. Kryworuchko, Jennifer, Stacey, Dawn, Bennett, Carol et al. (2008) Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support. Patient education and counseling 73(3): 497-503

  3. Rutherford, Claudia, King, Madeleine T, Butow, Phyllis et al. (2019) Is quality of life a suitable measure of patient decision aid effectiveness? Sub-analysis of a Cochrane systematic review. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 28(3): 593-607

  4. Scholl I, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Sepucha K et al. (2011) Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen 105(4): 313-324

ISBN: 978-1-4731-4171-1