Suggested remit: To appraise the clinical and cost effectiveness of bepirovirsen within its marketing authorisation for treating chronic hepatitis B.

Status:
In progress
Technology type:
Medicine
Decision:
Selected
Reason for decision:
Anticipate the topic will be of importance to patients, carers, professionals, commissioners and the health of the public to ensure clinical benefit is realised, inequalities in use addressed, and help them make the best use of NHS resources
Process:
STA Standard
ID number:
6608

Provisional Schedule

Committee meeting: 1:
12 January 2027
Expected publication:
10 March 2027

Project Team

Project lead
Leena Issa

Email enquiries

If you have any queries please email TACommC@nice.org.uk


External Assessment Group:
Southampton Health Technology Assessment Centre (SHTAC), University of Southampton

Stakeholders

Companies sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline (bepirovirsen)
Others
Department of Health and Social Care
 
NHS England
Patient carer groups
Addiction Recovery Agency
 
African Health Policy Network (AHPN)
 
Black Health Agency for Equality
 
British Liver Trust
 
Compass UK
 
Hepatitis B Trust
 
HepB Companion
 
HIV i-Base
 
LGBT Hero
 
Liver4Life
 
LIVErNORTH
 
National AIDS Trust
 
Positively UK
 
Release
 
South Asian Health Foundation
 
Specialised Healthcare Alliance
 
Terrence Higgins Trust
 
The Hepatitis C Trust
 
We Are With You
Professional groups
British Association for Sexual Health and HIV
 
British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL)
 
British Geriatrics Society
 
British Hepatology Pharmacy Group
 
British HIV Association
 
British Society for Gastroenterology
 
British Viral Hepatitis Group
 
Matthews lab HBV Elimination Laboratory (The Francis Crick Institute)
 
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation and Behavioural Science University of Bristol
 
Royal College of General Practitioners
 
Royal College of Nursing
 
Royal College of Pathologists
 
Royal College of Physicians
 
Royal Pharmaceutical Society
 
Royal Society of Medicine
 
UK Clinical Pharmacy Association
 
UK Clinical Virology Network
 
UK Harm Reduction Alliance
Associated public health groups
Public Health Wales
 
UK Health Security Agency
Comparator companies
Aristo Pharma (entecavir)
 
Aurobindo Pharma (entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Bristol Myers Squibb (entecavir)
 
Cipla (entecavir)
 
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Gilead Sciences (tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals (entecavir)
 
Orion Pharma (tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Pharmaand (peginterferon alfa-2a)
 
Sandoz (tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Sun Pharma UK (entecavir)
 
Thornton & Ross (tenofovir disoproxil)
 
Viatris (tenofovir disoproxil)
General commentators
All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre
 
Allied Health Professionals Federation
 
Board of Community Health Councils in Wales
 
British National Formulary
 
Care Quality Commission
 
Department of Health - Northern Ireland
 
Haemophilia Wales
 
Healthcare Improvement Scotland
 
Hepatitis Scotland
 
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
 
National Association of Primary Care
 
National Pharmacy Association
 
NHS Confederation
 
NHS England Viral Hepatitis Elimination Programme
 
NHS Wales Joint Commissioning Committee
 
Scottish Medicines Consortium
 
Scottish Society of Gastroenterology
 
Welsh Government
Relevant research groups
Genomics England
 
MRC Clinical Trials Unit
 
National Institute for Health & Care Research
 
UCL Centre for Sexual Health & HIV Research
 
UK National Screening Committee

Related links

Timeline

Key events during the development of the guidance:

Date Update
08 June 2026 Invitation to participate
06 March 2026 - 07 April 2026 Consultation on suggested remit, draft scope and provisional stakeholder list of consultees and commentators: 6608
06 March 2026 In progress. Scoping commencing
26 September 2025 Awaiting development. We anticipate that the appraisal will begin in early June 2026 when we will write to stakeholders about how to get involved.
20 June 2025 Awaiting development. Status change linked to Topic Selection Decision being set to Selected

For further information on our processes and methods, please see our CHTE processes and methods manual