Evidence generation plan
Open for comments Open until Request commenting lead permission
We have updated this service so that members of the same organisation can now collaborate on a joint online response.
Read our blog to learn more.
6 Implementation considerations
The following considerations around implementing the evidence generation process have been identified through working with system partners:
Evidence generation period
To collect useful data on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rates, the length of data collection will need to be sufficient. Clinical advice suggests that 3 years of follow-up data is appropriate, so companies will need to be efficient in starting data collection.
Companies will need to be proactive about contacting national data registries, to ensure that data sharing agreements are in place.
Equalities
Data should be collected on ethnicity and analysed to assess any differences in diagnostic accuracy when the AI software is used for people from different ethnic backgrounds.
System considerations
When introducing AI-supported polyp detection, care should be taken to ensure that endoscopist skill and experience is not lost or fails to develop.
Companies should use dedicated and incentivised research staff, to reduce the burden on non-research staff.
Real-world data should be used when possible.
ISBN: [to be added at publication]
How are you taking part in this consultation?
You will not be able to change how you comment later.
You must be signed in to answer questions
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation