How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Document

    Proposed new recommendations 1.3.1 to 1.3.4 post-anaphylaxis observation periods for children and adults. Do you agree with the proposal to update CG134 recommendations about post-anaphylaxis observation periods with the Resuscitation Council UK’s recommendations? Yes/no. Please provide a rationale for your decision
  • Question on Document

    Proposed new recommendation 1.4.1 admission of children who cannot be safely discharged. This recommendation has been added to make it clear how children who do not meet criteria in proposed recommendations 1.3.1 to 1.3.4 should be cared for. Do you agree with the proposal to recommend that children younger than 16 years who cannot be discharged using the discharge criteria recommended by new proposed recommendations 1.3.1 to 1.3.4 should be admitted under the care of a paediatric medical team? Yes/no. Please provide a rationale for your decision
  • Question on Document

    Proposed new recommendation 1.4.3 offer of adrenaline auto-injectors following emergency treatment for suspected anaphylaxis and when they should be offered. This recommendation has been updated to reflect advice from the MHRA on adrenaline autoinjectors and to align with British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Resuscitation Council UK guidance about when they should be offered. Do you agree that people should be offered 2 adrenaline auto-injectors as an interim measure before they attend for a specialist allergy appointment, unless the suspected anaphylaxis was due to a drug allergy that can be easily avoided. Yes/no. Please provide a rationale for your decision
  • Question on Document

    Amended recommendation 1.5.1 discharge practice. This recommendation has been amended for consistency with proposed recommendations 1.3.1 to 1.3.4, including the addition of a new bullet which clarifies discharge recommendations for people who have experienced suspected anaphylaxis due to a drug allergy where the drug is subsequently easily avoided. Do you agree with the amended bulleted recommendation? Yes/No. Please provide a rationale for your decision.
  • Question on Document

    Are there any health inequalities issues related to the draft recommendations that you think need to be considered?

Context

Anaphylaxis is a serious systemic hypersensitivity reaction that is usually rapid in onset and may cause death. It is characterised by rapidly developing, life-threatening problems involving: the airway (pharyngeal or laryngeal oedema) and/or breathing (bronchospasm with tachypnoea) and/or circulation (hypotension and/or tachycardia). According to Resuscitation Council UK's guideline on emergency treatment of anaphylaxis, in most cases, there are associated skin and mucosal changes.

Severe anaphylaxis is characterized by potentially life-threatening compromise in airway, breathing and/or the circulation, and may occur without typical skin features or circulatory shock being present.

In emergency departments a person who presents with the signs and symptoms listed above may be classified as having a 'severe allergic' reaction rather than anaphylaxis. Throughout this guideline, anyone who presents with such signs and symptoms is classed as experiencing 'suspected anaphylaxis' and should be diagnosed as having 'suspected anaphylaxis'.

People who have had a mild or moderate allergic reaction are at risk of, and may subsequently present with, suspected anaphylaxis. Certain groups may be at higher risk, either because of an existing comorbidity (for example asthma) or because they are more likely to be exposed to the same allergen again (for example people with venom allergies or reactions to specific food triggers). These groups were not included within the scope of this guideline, which is specific to those who have received emergency treatment for suspected anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis may be an allergic response that is immunologically mediated, or a non-immunologically mediated response, or idiopathic. Certain foods, insect venoms, some drugs and latex are common precipitants of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic anaphylaxis. Many drugs can also act through non‑allergic mechanisms. A significant proportion of anaphylaxis is classified as idiopathic, in which there are significant clinical effects but no readily identifiable cause. The relative likelihood of the reaction being allergic, non‑allergic or idiopathic varies considerably with age.

Food is a particularly common trigger in children, while medicinal products are much more common triggers in older people. In the UK it is estimated that 500,000 people have had venom-induced anaphylaxis and 220,000 people up to the age of 44 have had nut-induced anaphylaxis.

There is no overall figure for the frequency of anaphylaxis from all causes in the UK. Because anaphylaxis presents mainly in accident and emergency departments and outpatient settings, few estimates of prevalence are available from NHS sources. Anaphylaxis may not be recorded, or may be misdiagnosed as something else, for example, asthma. It may also be recorded by cause, such as food allergy, rather than as anaphylaxis.

Available UK estimates suggest that approximately 1 in 1333 of the population of England has experienced anaphylaxis at some point in their lives. There are approximately 20 deaths from anaphylaxis reported each year in the UK, with around half the deaths being iatrogenic, although this may be an underestimate.

After acute anaphylaxis, it is believed that many people do not receive optimal management of their condition. One reason for this is healthcare professionals' lack of understanding when making a diagnosis, for example failing to differentiate anaphylaxis from less severe histamine-releasing reactions or from other conditions that mimic some or all of its clinical features. Another reason is a lack of understanding of when or where to refer patients. This can affect the likelihood of the person receiving a definitive diagnosis, which can lead to anxiety, inappropriate management and recurrent reactions. It can also lead to avoidable costs for the NHS and increase the need for acute care.