Digital technologies for assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Clinicians reported increased diagnostic confidence, with 92% agreeing that the QbTest helped them feel more confident in making diagnostic decisions.

93% stated the QbTest helped them better understand the young person's presenting needs.

62% felt it helped them reach diagnostic decisions more quickly, with indications that this may improve further now that clinics are well established.

Regular QbTest clinics were shown to be essential to ensure timely incorporation into assessments.

Data indicated the QbTest was used more frequently with females than males, particularly older teenage girls.

The tool was especially valuable where:

Feedback highlighted that QbTest results could replace more time‑intensive activities such as school observations.

A full‑team training approach improved consistency and confidence in administration and interpretation.

Interpretation skills continue to develop, supported by QbTech online modules, follow‑up training and the creation of clinical 'champions' who run clinics regularly.

Implementation required time and adjustment; capacity had to be increased to meet demand.

The QbTest is particularly helpful in complex presentations, including where autism, learning disability, trauma or non‑attendance at school make diagnostic formulation more challenging.

Future plans include refining criteria for identifying which assessments would benefit from a QbTest and ensuring it is completed early enough to inform the first multidisciplinary team discussion.