Overview of 2018 surveillance methods
NICE's surveillance team checked whether recommendations in physical activity for children and young people (NICE guideline PH17) remain up to date.
The surveillance process consisted of:
Initial feedback from topic experts through a questionnaire.
Input from voluntary and community sector organisations and stakeholders on known variations in practice and policy priorities.
Literature searches to identify relevant evidence.
Assessing the new evidence against current recommendations and deciding whether or not to update sections of the guideline, or the whole guideline.
Consulting on the decision with stakeholders and considering comments received during consultation.
For further details about the process and the possible update decisions that are available, see ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in developing NICE guidelines: the manual.
We searched for new evidence related to the whole guideline.
We found 40 studies in a search for randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and qualitative studies published between 1 August 2014 and 15 February 2018.
We also included:
4 studies identified in comments received during consultation on the 2018 surveillance decision
12 studies included in the previous surveillance review.
From all sources, we considered 56 studies to be relevant to the guideline.
See appendix A: summary of evidence from surveillance for details of all evidence considered, and references.
The standard surveillance review process of using randomised controlled trial and systematic review selection criteria would not capture relevant studies investigating barriers and facilitators to physical activity uptake in children. In line with the selection criteria used in the guideline, we included qualitative evidence in this area.
We identified ongoing research that may impact the guideline. Of the ongoing studies identified, 2 were assessed as having the potential to change recommendations; therefore we plan to check the publication status regularly, and evaluate the impact of the results on current recommendations as quickly as possible. These studies are:
We sent questionnaires to 14 topic experts and received 6 responses. The topic experts participated in the guideline committee who developed the guideline.
All of the topic experts felt that the guideline is in need of an update. Examples of areas for update include aligning recommendations with the most recent guidelines from the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) on UK physical activity levels, which we are addressing with an editorial amendment. Other areas included evidence on sedentary behaviour, a need to emphasise importance of data collection and to amend recommendations that referenced old structures and job roles that no longer exist. We have planned several editorial amendments, which address concerns around CMO guidance and old job structures. We are also monitoring several ongoing trials that focus on reducing sedentary behaviour. For further details of how the concerns from topic experts have been addressed, see appendix A: summary of evidence from surveillance.
For this surveillance review, 2 voluntary and community sector organisations completed a questionnaire about developments in evidence, policy and services related to the guideline. One organisation indicated that the guideline should be updated to align with the most recent CMO guidance on physical activity.
See appendix A: summary of evidence from surveillance for details of how the concerns from voluntary and community sector organisations have been addressed.
Stakeholders are consulted on all surveillance decisions except if the whole guideline will be updated and replaced. Because this surveillance decision was to not update the guideline, we consulted on the decision.
Overall, 4 stakeholders commented. Two organisations agreed with the decision to not update the guideline, yet they highlighted further evidence and impending publications that should be considered in this surveillance review and in future checks. One organisation disagreed with the decision and one noted that they had no comments on the proposal.
A concern was raised that data collection in the area of physical activity in children needs to be improved and there was a call for NICE to recommend that national governing bodies should encourage standardised measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness in children and young people. Because NICE no longer makes recommendations aimed at national bodies, no impact on the guideline is expected. However, we have kept research recommendation 2, which highlights the need for higher-quality research in this area to inform the guideline in future.
There was also a request for the guideline to include more specific recommendations on how to support children to exercise if they have a physical condition such as diabetes, which requires planning beforehand in order to manage blood glucose levels. Such recommendations can be found in NICE's guideline on diabetes (type 1 and type 2) in children and young people, and therefore no impact is expected.
New evidence was highlighted on the barriers to implementation of physical activity policies in schools. We have added this evidence to appendix A; however, no impact on the guideline is expected because the recommendations already broadly address the themes identified in the new evidence.
Two impending government reports were highlighted as having potential to impact the recommendations in future: the Ofsted report on 'Obesity, health eating and physical activity in schools' and the next chapter of the Childhood obesity plan. These details have been logged so that that we can monitor progress of the publications and assess the potential impact on recommendations when the reports become available. This is also the case for the new CMO physical activity guidance expected in 2019, as noted in our surveillance decision.
See appendix B for full details of stakeholders' comments and our responses.
See ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in developing NICE guidelines: the manual for more details on our consultation processes.
During surveillance of the guideline we identified the following points in the guideline that should be amended.
Recommendation 2: In the 'Who should take action' section, the following organisations and job roles should be removed because they no longer exist: Chief executives of primary care trusts and chairs of children's trusts.
Recommendation 2: In the 'What action should they take' section, the last sentence of bullet 2 should be removed because local area agreement targets are no longer in use: 'The strategy should help achieve local area agreement targets'.
Recommendation 3: In the 'What action should they take' section, the mention of 'public health observatory' in bullet 1 should be replaced with 'Public Health England centres'. Public health observatories became part of Public Health England in April 2013.
Recommendations 3, 7 and 11: The cross referral to NICE guideline PH9 should be corrected to refer to the updated NICE guideline on community engagement: improving health and wellbeing and reducing health inequalities (NG44).
Recommendations 4 and 5: The cross referral to NICE guideline PH8 should be corrected to refer to the updated NICE guideline on physical activity and the environment (NG90).
Recommendation 12: To avoid overlap of recommendations across NICE guidelines, this recommendation should be stood down and replaced with a cross-referral to recommendation 8 in the NICE guideline on physical activity: walking and cycling (PH41).
Recommendation 15: Bullet 1 should be corrected so that it is aligned with the most recent CMO guidelines on physical activity. The revised bullet point should state: 'Ensure parents and carers are aware of the government advice on how much physical activity children and young people should be doing'.
This page was last updated: 31 July 2018