How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Consultation

    a. Has all of the relevant evidence been taken into account?
  • Question on Consultation

    b. Are the summaries of safety and efficacy reasonable interpretations of the evidence?
  • Question on Consultation

    c. Are the recommendations sound and a suitable basis for guidance to the NHS?
  • Question on Consultation

    d. Are there any aspects of the recommendations that need particular consideration to ensure we avoid unlawful discrimination against any group of people on the grounds of age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation?

4 Committee members and NICE project team

This topic was considered by NICE's interventional procedures advisory committee, which is a standing advisory committee of NICE.

Committee members are asked to declare any interests in the technology to be evaluated. If it is considered there is a conflict of interest, the member is excluded from participating further in that evaluation.

The minutes of each committee meeting, which include the names of the members who attended and their declarations of interests, are posted on the NICE website.

Chair

Rick Body
Chair, interventional procedures advisory committee

NICE project team

Each evaluation is assigned to a team consisting of 1 or more health technology analysts (who act as technical leads for the evaluation), a technical adviser, a consultant clinical adviser, a project manager and an associate director.

Helen Gallo and Robbie Pitcher
Technical leads

Evan Campbell
Technical adviser

Anthony Akobeng
Consultant clinical adviser

Corrina Purdue
Project manager

Rebecca Albrow
Associate director

ISBN: [to be added at publication]