How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Consultation

    1. Do you agree with the proposal not to update the guideline? Please could let us know if you agree or disagree (yes/no) and also provide with your comments regarding the same
  • Question on Consultation

    1. Do you have any comments on areas excluded from the scope of the guideline? Please could let us know if you agree or disagree (yes/no) and also provide with your comments regarding the same
  • Question on Consultation

    1. Do you have any comments on equalities issues? Please could let us know if you agree or disagree (yes/no) and also provide with your comments regarding the same
The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

References

  1. Hess E, Knoedler M, Shah N, Kline J, Breslin M, Branda M, et al. (2012) The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 5(3):251–9

  2. de Waure C, Cadeddu C, Gualano M, Ricciardi W (2012) Telemedicine for the reduction of myocardial infarction mortality: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of published studies. Telemedicine Journal and e-health: the Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association 18(5):323–8

  3. Sequist TD, Morong SM, Marston A, Keohane CA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, et al. (2012) Electronic risk alerts to improve primary care management of chest pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27(4):438–44

  4. Pelter MM, Riegel B, McKinley S, Moser DK, Doering L V, Meischke H, et al. (2012) Are there symptom differences in patients with coronary artery disease presenting to the ED ultimately diagnosed with or without ACS? The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 30(9):1822–8

  5. Haasenritter J, Stanze D, Widera G, Wilimzig C, Abu Hani M, Sonnichsen AC, et al. (2012) Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis. Croatian Medical Journal 53(5):432–41

  6. Leisy PJ, Coeytaux RR, Wagner GS, Chung EH, McBroom AJ, Green CL, et al. (2013) ECG-based signal analysis technologies for evaluating patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of Electrocardiology 46(2):92–7

  7. van Tulder R, Roth D, Weiser C, Heidinger B, Herkner H, Schreiber W, et al. (2012) An electrocardiogram technician improves in-hospital first medical contact-to-electrocardiogram times: a cluster randomized controlled interventional trial. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 30(9):1729–36

  8. Sundström BW, Bång A, Karlsson T, Winge K, Lundberg C, Herlitz J (2013) Anxiolytics in patients suffering a suspected acute coronary syndrome: multi-centre randomised controlled trial in Emergency Medical Service. International Journal of Cardiology 168(4):3580–7

  9. Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Erlinge D, Witt N, et al. (2017) Oxygen Therapy in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine 377(13):1240–9

  10. Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Alfredsson J, Berglund E, Bergström O, Engström A, et al. (2018) Long-Term Effects of Oxygen Therapy on Death or Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 138(24):2754–62

  11. Bradburn M, Goodacre SW, Fitzgerald P, Coats T, Gray A, Hassan T, et al. (2012) Interhospital variation in the RATPAC trial (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers). Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ 29(3):233–8

  12. Bruins Slot MHE, van der Heijden GJMG, Stelpstra SD, Hoes AW, Rutten FH (2013) Point-of-care tests in suspected acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. International Journal of Cardiology 168(6):5355–62

  13. Badertscher P, Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Sabti Z, et al. (2018) Effect of acute coronary syndrome probability on diagnostic and prognostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Clinical Chemistry 64(3):515–25

  14. Body R, Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordonez-Llanos J, de Filippi CR, et al. (2016) The Use of Very Low Concentrations of High-sensitivity Troponin T to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a Single Blood Test. Academic emergency medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 23(9):1004–13

  15. Ljung L, Reichard C, Hagerman P, Eggers KM, Frick M, Lindahl B, et al. (2019) Sensitivity of undetectable level of high-sensitivity troponin T at presentation in a large non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cohort of early presenters. International Journal of Cardiology 284:6–11

  16. Tajsic M, Jarai R, Koch J, Stangl K, Wojta J, Dreger H, et al. (2018) Midregional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide as part of a dual biomarker strategy for the early rule out of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome - The WilCop study. International Journal of Cardiology 273:243–8

  17. Twerenbold R, Neumann JT, Sorensen NA, Ojeda F, Karakas M, Boeddinghaus J, et al. (2018) Prospective Validation of the 0/1-h Algorithm for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 72(6):620–32

  18. Twerenbold R, Badertscher P, Boeddinghaus J, Nestelberger T, Wildi K, Puelacher C, et al. (2018) 0/1-Hour Triage Algorithm for Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Renal Dysfunction. Circulation 137(5):436–51

  19. Wildi K, Nelles B, Twerenbold R, Rubini Gimenez M, Reichlin T, Singeisen H, et al. (2016) Safety and efficacy of the 0 h/3 h protocol for rapid rule out of myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 181:16–25

  20. Shah AS V, Anand A, Strachan FE, Ferry A V, Lee KK, Chapman AR, et al. (2018) High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 392(10151):919–28

  21. Chew DP, Zeitz C, Worthley M, Grantham H, Beltrame J, Arstall M, et al. (2016) Randomized Comparison of High-Sensitivity Troponin Reporting in Undifferentiated Chest Pain Assessment. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 9(5):542–53

  22. Kaambwa B, Ratcliffe J, Horsfall M, Astley C, Karnon J, Coates P, et al. (2017) Cost effectiveness of high-sensitivity troponin compared to conventional troponin among patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain: A trial based analysis. International Journal of Cardiology 238:144–50

  23. Dadkhah S, Almuwaqqat Z, Sulaiman S, Husein H, Nguyen Q, Ali S, et al. (2017) Sensitive Troponin I and Stress Testing in the Emergency Department for the Early Management of Chest Pain Using 2-Hour Protocol. Critical pathways in cardiology 16(3):89–92

  24. Adamson PD, Hunter A, Madsen DM, Shah AS V, McAllister DA, Pawade TA, et al. (2018) High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Suspected Angina Pectoris. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 11(2):e004227

  25. Adamson PD, Fordyce CB, McAllister DA, Udelson JE, Douglas PS, Newby DE (2018) Identification of patients with stable chest pain deriving minimal value from coronary computed tomography angiography: An external validation of the PROMISE minimal-risk tool. International Journal of Cardiology 252:31–4

  26. Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah AS V, Assi V, Lewis S, Smith J, et al. (2016) Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 67(15):1759–68

  27. Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah A, Assi V, Lewis S, Mangion K, et al. (2017) Symptoms and quality of life in patients with suspected angina undergoing CT coronary angiography: a randomised controlled trial. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 103(13):995–1001

  28. Adamson PD, Hunter A, Williams MC, Shah AS V, McAllister DA, Pawade TA, et al. (2018) Diagnostic and prognostic benefits of computed tomography coronary angiography using the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance within a randomised trial. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 104(3):207–14

  29. SCOT-HEART Investigators, Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, Boon NA, Dweck MR, et al. (2018) Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine 379(10):924–33

  30. Norgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, Ito H, Miyoshi T, Park S-J, et al. (2015) Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging 8(9):1045–55

  31. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, et al. (2018) Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

  32. Rother J, Moshage M, Dey D, Schwemmer C, Trobs M, Blachutzik F, et al. (2018) Comparison of invasively measured FFR with FFR derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: Results from a PC-based prototype algorithm. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 12(2):101–7

  33. Shi C, Zhang D, Cao K, Zhang T, Luo L, Liu X, et al. (2017) A study of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from a simplified method based on coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. Biomedical Engineering Online 16(1):43

  34. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, et al. (2016) 1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 68(5):435–45

© NICE 2019. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights.