The committee agreed that it is important that people with advanced breast cancer have opportunities to be involved in research to help improve the evidence base underlying which treatments are clinically effective. These opportunities should be made available whenever appropriate and not only after standard treatment lines are exhausted. The opportunities should not be limited to their centre, but taking part in research in other centres may involve travelling further or more frequently, and practical issues such as this should be discussed with the person. There may also be non-clinical studies, for example looking at their views and experiences of treatment.
The committee noted that advanced breast cancer is not coded consistently in current practice, and that this can make it hard to estimate incidence and prevalence. They agreed that accurately recording which people have advanced disease and the treatments they receive will help with forward planning of resource allocations, and support research and improvements in the quality of care. The committee were aware of the National Audit of Metastatic Breast Cancer (NAoMe), and agreed that it is important to support the data collection for this and future national audits to improve practice. They made a consensus recommendation to address this.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review A: platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens and evidence review B: FDG PET-CT and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosing and monitoring distant metastases.