Recommendations for research
The guideline committee has made the following recommendations for research.
Key recommendations for research
1 Effectiveness of tranexamic acid for children and young people
What is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tranexamic acid compared to placebo for children and young people undergoing surgery in reducing the risk of post-operative infection, length of stay and the need for a blood transfusion? [2026]
For a short explanation of why the committee made this recommendation for research, see the rationale section on tranexamic acid.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review A: tranexamic acid for reducing anticipated minor blood loss due to surgery and evidence review B: safety of tranexamic acid during surgery.
2 Effectiveness of tranexamic acid for specific vascular surgery procedures
What is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of tranexamic acid compared to placebo for people having specific vascular surgery procedures in reducing vessel-related thromboembolic events and infection? [2026]
For a short explanation of why the committee made this recommendation for research, see the rationale section on tranexamic acid.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review A: tranexamic acid for reducing anticipated minor blood loss due to surgery and evidence review B: safety of tranexamic acid during surgery.
3 Red blood cell transfusion thresholds for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease
What is the clinical and cost effectiveness of restrictive compared with liberal red blood cell thresholds and targets for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease? [2015]
Why this is important
The literature suggests that there may be some evidence of harm with the use of restrictive red blood cell thresholds in populations with coronary ischaemia at baseline. In this guideline a level of 80 to 100 g/litre was used for patients with acute coronary syndrome, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal transfusion threshold for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease.
4 Electronic Decision Support
What is the clinical and cost effectiveness of an electronic decision support system compared with current practice in reducing inappropriate blood transfusions, overall rates of blood transfusion and mortality? [2015]
Why this is important
The clinical evidence evaluating electronic decision support systems is of low quality. There is also no evidence on their cost effectiveness within the NHS, and this is particularly important because of the potentially high setup and running costs of these systems. An evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of electronic decision support systems for blood transfusion is needed. Important outcomes are rates of inappropriate transfusion, overall rates of transfusion, and patient safety outcomes including mortality and transfusion errors. Secondary outcomes should include length of hospital stay and quality of life; and pre‑transfusion haemoglobin levels, platelet count and coagulation results.
5 Post‑operative cell salvage for patients having cardiac surgery with a significant risk of post‑operative blood loss
For patients having cardiac surgery with a significant risk of post‑operative blood loss, is post‑operative cell salvage and reinfusion clinically and cost effective in reducing red blood cell use and improving clinical outcomes, compared with existing practice? [2015]
Why this is important
There was some evidence for benefit from post‑operative cell salvage, but the quality was low. Reducing blood loss during cardiac surgery may reduce the risk of complications. However, post‑operative cell salvage carries additional cost. Studies are needed to determine whether post‑operative cell salvage is more clinically and cost effective than existing practice for patients having cardiac surgery with a significant risk of post‑operative blood loss. Important outcomes should include the use of red blood cells and other blood components, clinical outcomes and quality of life.
Other recommendations for research
6 Fresh frozen plasma for patients with abnormal haemostasis who are having invasive procedures or surgery
What dose of fresh frozen plasma is most clinically effective at preventing bleeding in patients with abnormal haemostasis who are having invasive procedures or surgery? [2015]
Why this is important
Audits have shown that fresh frozen plasma is widely used for non‑bleeding patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and many other clinical settings. There is a large variation in dose and no real evidence base to guide practice. Fresh frozen plasma transfusions may cause adverse outcomes in people who are critically ill, including transfusion‑related acute lung injury, transfusion‑related circulatory overload, multi‑organ failure and an increased risk of infections.
A multicentre study (2011) of ICUs in the UK showed that 12.7% of patients admitted to the ICU received fresh frozen plasma. The median dose was 10.8 ml/kg, but doses varied widely (range 2.4 to 41.1 ml/kg). This study showed that a high proportion of fresh frozen plasma transfusions had unproven clinical benefit.
Better evidence from clinical trials could significantly alter how fresh frozen plasma is used, and in particular ensure that clinically effective doses are given to patients.