Search results

Skip to results

Area of interest

Area of interest

Type

Type

Status

Status

Last updated

Last updated

Guidance programme

Advice programme

Showing 3016 to 3030 of 8218 results

  1. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s. Patient decision aid on decompressive hemicraniectomy surgery in people over 60

    1 Stroke: decompressive hemicraniectomy surgery in people over 60 Patient decision aid What are the pros and cons of decompressive hemicraniectomy?...

  2. Weight management: advice for people living with overweight (18 to 39 years) (IND319)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients aged 18 to 39 years with a BMI of 23 kg/m2 to 27.4 kg/m2 (or 25 kg/m2 to 29.9 kg/m2 if ethnicity is recorded as White) in the preceding 12 months who have been given weight management advice within 90 days of the BMI being recorded. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  3. Infections: scoring tools for sore throat (IND323)

    This indicator covers the percentage of diagnoses of sore throat in the preceding 12 months with a recorded FeverPain or Centor score. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  4. Kidney conditions: CKD and SGLT2 inhibitors (IND322)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients on the CKD register and currently treated with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or an ACE inhibitor (unless these are contraindicated) who are also treated with an SGLT-2 inhibitor if they have: no type 2 diabetes and an eGFR 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 44 ml/min/1.73 m2, or no type 2 diabetes and an eGFR 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) of 22.6 mg/mmol or more, or type 2 diabetes and a urine ACR 3 mg/mmol or more. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  5. Screening: cervical (25 to 64 years) (IND321)

    This indicator covers the percentage of women eligible for cervical screening and aged 25 to 64 years at end of the period reported whose notes record that an adequate cervical screening test has been performed in the previous 5.5 years. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  6. Weight management: BMI recording (long term conditions) (IND320)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients with coronary heart disease, stroke or TIA, diabetes, at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, hypertension, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, COPD, dyslipidaemia, learning disability, obstructive sleep apnoea, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychoses who have had a BMI recorded in the preceding 12 months. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  7. Heart failure: ejection fraction category (IND318)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of heart failure on or after 1 April 2026 who have a recorded ejection fraction category (reduced, mildly reduced, or preserved). It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  8. Heart failure: 4 pillars (HFrEF) (IND317)

    This indicator covers the the percentage of patients with a current diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, who are currently treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker, a beta blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  9. Asthma: MART (higher risk patients) (IND316)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients with asthma on the register aged 12 years or over with a risk factor for poor outcomes who are prescribed maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) in the preceding 12 months. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  10. Asthma: annual review (higher risk patients) (IND315)

    This indicator covers the percentage of patients with asthma on the register with a risk factor for poor outcomes, who have had an asthma review in the preceding 12 months that includes an assessment of asthma control, a recording of the number of exacerbations, an assessment of inhaler technique and a written personalised action plan. It measures outcomes that reflect the quality of care or processes linked by evidence to improved outcomes

  11. Healthy start vitamins: special report on cost effectiveness (ECD5)

    This document describes a special report on the cost effectiveness of moving the Healthy Start vitamin programme from the current targeted offering to a universal offering

  12. Accessibility changes: notes for developers (ECD6)

    This document summarises the most common accessibility changes NICE is making in guidelines, and why

  13. Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies (ECD7)

    This document describes an evidence standards framework (ESF) for digital health technologies (DHTs). It was developed by NICE between June 2018 and February 2019 in collaboration with NHS England, Public Health England and MedCity. The work was commissioned by NHS England

  14. Standards framework for shared-decision-making support tools, including patient decision aids (ECD8)

    This document describes the framework for setting out a series of standards to support people using patient decision aids (PDAs) in assessing the usefulness and quality of a PDA. It will also be useful to those developing PDAs in enabling them to undertake a self-assessment of the quality of their tools and processes

  15. NICE real-world evidence framework (ECD9)

    This document describes a real-world evidence framework that aims to improve the quality of real-world evidence informing our guidance. The framework does not set minimum standards for the acceptability of evidence. The framework is mainly targeted at those developing evidence to inform NICE guidance. It is also relevant to patients, those collecting data, and reviewers of evidence