Search results

Skip to results

Area of interest

Area of interest

Type

Type

Status

Status

Last updated

Last updated

Guidance programme

Advice programme

Showing 6106 to 6120 of 8314 results

  1. Reducing demands on health and social care services:- Do preventive oral health interventions in residential and nursing care homes reduce demands on other health and social care services?

    Recommendation ID NG48/5 Question Reducing demands on health and social care services:- Do preventive oral health interventions in residential

    Research recommendation
    Published
    24 August 2016

  2. Reducing social isolation and associated child abuse and neglect:- What is the impact of social isolation on children, young people and families at risk of abuse andneglect in the UK? What interventions are effective and cost effective in a UK context in reducing social isolation and any associated child abuse and neglect?

    Recommendation ID NG76/6 Question Reducing social isolation and associated child abuse and neglect:- What is the impact of social isolation

    Research recommendation
    Published
    18 October 2018

  3. Reducing the risk of complications of anticancer treatment in children and young people, and in adults diagnosed with lymphoma:- Randomised studies should investigate primary prophylaxis of neutropenic sepsis in 2 populations: children and young people (aged under 18) having treatment for solid tumours or haematological malignancies, or stem cell transplantation; and adults (aged 18 and older) diagnosed with lymphoma. The studies should compare the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone antibiotics given alone, fluoroquinolone antibiotics given together with G-CSF preparations, and G-CSF preparations given alone. Outcome measures should include overall mortality, infectious episodes and adverse events. In addition, quality of life should be determined using quantitative and qualitative methods. The resulting data should be used to develop a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing these 3 forms of prophylaxis in children and young people having anticancer treatment, and in adults diagnosed with lymphoma.

    Recommendation ID CG151/4 Question Reducing the risk of complications of anticancer treatment in children and young people, and in adults

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  4. Recommendation 3 Barriers and facilitators. Who should take action? Research councils, commissioners and funders. Researchers and investigators.

    Recommendation ID PH47/3 Question Recommendation 3 Barriers and facilitators. Who should take action? Research councils, commissioners

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  5. Timing of CT head scans: What is the relative accuracy of CT head scans at different time intervals, for example 12 hours or 24 hours after symptom onset, to diagnose subarachnoid haemorrhage?

    Recommendation ID NG228/01 Question Timing of CT head scans: What is the relative accuracy of CT head scans at different time intervals

    Research recommendation
    Published
    12 December 2022

  6. What is the relationship between the following factors and outcomes related to nursing care, patient safety and patients' and nursing staff satisfaction with the quality of care in the UK? - Number of nursing staff - Nursing skill mix - Shift patterns

    Recommendation ID SG1/1 Question What is the relationship between the following factors and outcomes related to nursing care, patient safety

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  7. What is the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the different components of multi-component, community-based oral health improvement programmes?

    Recommendation ID PH55/6 Question What is the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the different components of multi-component

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  8. Evidence is adequate on the short-term safety and efficacy of personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) using mesh to prevent aortic root expansion and aortic dissection in people with Marfan syndrome. Evidence on long-term outcomes is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page. Further research should report details of patient selection, including aortic diameter, and long-term outcomes, including evidence of disease progression, such as dilation and dissection of the aortic root.

    Recommendation ID IPG724/01 Question Evidence is adequate on the short-term safety and efficacy of personalised external aortic root support

    Research recommendation
    Published
    31 May 2022

  9. What specialist investigations should be conducted to exclude a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in people with uninvestigated dyspepsia that does not respond to PPIs or H 2   receptor antagonists (H 2 RAs) despite optimum primary care?

    Recommendation ID CG184/5 Question What specialist investigations should be conducted to exclude a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in

    Research recommendation
    Published
    15 November 2019

  10. What specialist management is effective for people whose symptoms do not respond to PPIs despite optimum primary care, or for people whose symptoms return after surgery?

    Recommendation ID CG184/4 Question What specialist management is effective for people whose symptoms do not respond to PPIs despite optimum

    Research recommendation
    Published
    15 November 2019

  11. Further studies on the clinical effectiveness of mifamurtide when combined with the chemotherapy typical of UK clinical practice would be useful to determine the size of the effect of mifamurtide.

    Recommendation ID TA235/1 Question Further studies on the clinical effectiveness of mifamurtide when combined with the chemotherapy typical

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  12. High-risk groups:- What interventions to prevent infection and reduce antimicrobial resistance are effective for groups of people at high risk of infection? This includes people who:- have suppressed immune systems (for example, because of HIV, an inherited condition or treatment they may be having for conditions such as cancer or an organ transplant)- have a chronic disease- live in crowded conditions (see Shelter's definition)- are homeless- have been in prison- have migrated from countries with a high prevalence of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis (examples include South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa).

    Recommendation ID NG63/3 Question High-risk groups:- What interventions to prevent infection and reduce antimicrobial resistance are effective

    Research recommendation
    Published
    17 February 2017

  13. Older people in day and residential care:- How effective are interventions in day and residential care for older people that aim to prevent infection and to reduce antimicrobial resistance?

    Recommendation ID NG63/5 Question Older people in day and residential care:- How effective are interventions in day and residential care

    Research recommendation
    Published
    17 February 2017

  14. Workplace:- How effective are interventions in the workplace that aim to prevent infection and reduce antimicrobial resistance?

    Recommendation ID NG63/4 Question Workplace:- How effective are interventions in the workplace that aim to prevent infection and reduce

    Research recommendation
    Published
    17 February 2017

  15. Behavioural strategies and programmes:- What is the feasibility and effectiveness of specific behavioural strategies and programmes to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial demand and use and to prevent infections occurring and spreading?

    Recommendation ID NG63/2 Question Behavioural strategies and programmes:- What is the feasibility and effectiveness of specific behavioural

    Research recommendation
    Published
    17 February 2017