Search results
Showing 3736 to 3750 of 8927 results
Transvaginal mesh repair of anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse (HTG456)
Evidence-based recommendations on transvaginal mesh repair of anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse. This involves inserting a mesh to replace tissue that has weakened and caused the pelvic organs to drop down (prolapse) into the vagina.
This manual sets out the process for how new guidance topics and updates to existing NICE guidance are identified, prioritised and routed at NICE, and the decision-making framework used by the NICE prioritisation board
Interim process and methods statement for bringing together NICE guidance (PMG47)
This interim process and methods statement sets out the general principles guiding NICE's approach to including NICE technology appraisal recommendations in guideline topic areas. It also describes what the key changes are to existing methods and processes
This guide describes the methods and processes that NICE follows when producing HealthTech guidance. For interventional procedures, this guide covers NICE processes. Methods for interventional procedures guidance are in the NICE's interventional procedures programme manual. The NICE HealthTech programme combines the former NICE Diagnostics Assessment programme, Interventional Procedures programme and Medical Technologies Evaluation programme
Processes and methods for NICE-wide guidance surveillance (PMG49)
This guide describes the methods and processes that NICE follows to assess the impact of new evidence, changes to the health and care system, or other new, relevant information that has come to light after NICE guidance has published
The NICE public health guidance development process (third edition) (PMG5)
This manual describes how public health guidance is produced, and explains the stages of guidance development, the different activities, roles and responsibilities of different groups of people involved at different stages
Interim methods guide for developing service guidance 2014 (PMG8)
This manual provides information additional to that in Developing NICE guidelines: the manual to guide developers on how to approach developing service guidance, and also to inform stakeholders about the steps that NICE will take in developing this guidance
This guide provides an overview of the principles and methods of health technology assessment and appraisal within the context of the NICE appraisal process
This document concerns the appeal process for the technology appraisal and highly specialised technologies programmes and provides an overview for organisations wishing to lodge an appeal
This document is one of a series describing the processes and methods that NICE uses to carry out technology appraisals. It focuses on the technology appraisal processes
Evidence summaries: unlicensed and off-label medicines – Interim process statement (PMG2)
This interim process statement sets out to guide the development of 'Evidence summaries: unlicensed and off-label medicines' (ESUOMs). It provides an overview of the key process principles and describes all stages of development for ESUOMs
This is the user guide for submission of evidence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal and highly specialised technologies evaluations process. It explains what information NICE requires and the format in which it should be presented
This guide describes the methods that NICE follows when evaluating interventional procedures. Processes for interventional procedures are in section 1 of the NICE HealthTech programme manual
NICE health technology evaluation topic selection: the manual (PMG37)
This manual sets out the process for deciding how topics are identified, selected and routed for NICE guidance developed by the Centre for Health Technology Evaluation (CHTE). This includes diagnostics, highly specialised technologies, interventional procedures, medical technologies and technology appraisal guidance
This process guide explains how treatment option summaries for multiple guidelines were developed in an open, transparent, and timely way, with appropriate expert input