Download indicator (PDF)

Indicator

The percentage of patients with moderate or severe frailty and/or multimorbidity who have received a medication review in the last 12 months which is structured, has considered the use of a recognised tool and taken place as a shared discussion.

Indicator type

General practice indicator suitable for use in the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

This document does not represent formal NICE guidance. For a full list of NICE indicators, see our menu of indicators.

To find out how to use indicators and how we develop them, see our NICE indicator process guide.

Rationale

Multimorbidity is associated with reduced quality of life, higher mortality, polypharmacy and higher treatment burden, higher rates of adverse drug events and greater health service including unplanned admissions and emergency care.

The NICE guideline on multimorbidity defines multimorbidity as two or more long-term health conditions that coexist independently in the same individual. NICE has developed a pragmatic definition of multimorbidity for the register using the presence of 4 or more condition categories which reflects an appraisal of international evidence, analysis of primary care data, and discussions with national academic, GP and clinical leads alongside the NICE Indicator Advisory Committee.

The conditions are based upon a cross-sectional study on the distribution of multimorbidity (Barnett et al. 2012).

Table 1 Multimorbidity register: people with conditions in 4 or more categories
Category Condition

Cancer

Cancer

Chronic pain

Painful condition (defined by the presence of 4 or more prescription only medicine analgesic prescriptions or 4 or more specified anti-epileptics in the absence of an epilepsy Read code in last 12 months)

Circulatory conditions

Coronary heart disease

Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Heart failure

Hypertension

Stroke or TIA

Peripheral vascular disease

Diabetes

Diabetes

Digestive system conditions

Currently treated constipation (4 or more laxative prescriptions in the last 12 months)

Diverticular disease of intestine

Inflammatory bowel disease

Chronic liver disease

Learning disability

Learning disability

Mental health

Anorexia or Bulimia

Anxiety & other neurotic, stress related and somatoform disorders

Dementia (including Alzheimer's)

Depression

Schizophrenia and related non-organic psychosis

Bipolar disorder

Alcohol problems

Psychoactive substance misuse

Musculoskeletal conditions

Rheumatoid arthritis

Other inflammatory polyarthropathies

Systemic connective tissue disorders

Neurological conditions

Currently treated epilepsy

Multiple sclerosis

Parkinson's (of any cause)

Renal conditions

Chronic kidney disease

Respiratory conditions

Currently treated asthma

COPD

Bronchiectasis

Polypharmacy is often driven by the introduction of multiple medicines intended to prevent further morbidity and mortality but other conditions that reduce life expectancy such as frailty may not be considered. The difference made by each new medicine may be reduced when other medicines are used.

A structured medicine review provides an opportunity for medicines optimisation and can lead to a reduction in adverse events by identifying and minimising risks related to prescribing. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are likely to be better when decisions are made jointly between the person taking the medicine and the prescriber.

Specification

Numerator: The number of patients in the denominator who have received a medication review in the last 12 months which is structured, has considered the use of a recognised tool and taken place as a shared discussion.

Denominator: The number of patients with moderate or severe frailty and/or multimorbidity.

Calculation: Numerator divided by the denominator, multiplied by 100.

Exclusions: None.

Minimum population: The indicator would be appropriate to assess performance at individual general practice level.

ISBN: 978-1-4731-5961-7